SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Guj) 24

A.N.SURTI
KAALIDAS KARSANBHAI CHAVDA – Appellant
Versus
RETURNING OFFICER,vadodara JILLA PANCHAYAT ELECTIONS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HARUBHAI MEHTA, K.J.VAIDYA

A. N. SURTI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner Kalidas Karsandas Chavda residing at village Anguthan Taluka Dabhoi district Vadodara was aggrieved by the order passed by respondent No. 1 the Returning Officer who rejected his nomination paper for the election to be held of the concerned Panchayat. For the election in question the nomination papers were to be filled in by the contesting candidates by 5/01/1981 and the scrutiny of the nomination papers was to take place on 6/01/1981

( 2 ) IT is the grievance of the petitioner that his nomination paper was rejected on the ground of omission to mention the name of the scheduled caste to which he belongs It may be noted at this stage that at the relevant time there were only two contesting candidates and as the nomination paper of the petitioner was rejected on the ground of omission to mention the name of the scheduled caste respondent No. 2 Shri Nathabhai Mavjibhai Parmar was declared elected as an uncontested candidate.

( 3 ) IT is under these circumstances that the petitioner was aggrieved by the impugned order or action taken by the Returning Officer and has filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. In essence and subst


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top