SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Guj) 53

V.V.BEDARKAR
SALAMBIN AMAR DOWDI – Appellant
Versus
HUSEINBIN SALAM DOWDI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ARVIND KUMAR SHAH, S.H.SANJANWALA

V. V. BEDARKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal filed by the original plaintiff whose suit being Civil Suit no. 47 of 1972 was decreed by the learned Civil Judge Junior Division Dharampur with costs holding that the appellant-plaintiff was entitled to 1/7th share in the immovable property and to 1 share in the movable property. But he observed that it would not be possible to divide 1/7th and 1/2 shares in the immovable and movable properties and hand them over to the plaintiff and the actual partition of both the properties would cause delay and expenses and so the plaintiff be given alternative remedy and therefore he decreed the amount of Rs. 1 0 as claimed by the plaintiff. He further ordered that the plaintiff may recover the decretal amount from the person and properties of the defendants with 6 per cent interest from the date of decree till realisation.

( 2 ) BEING dissatisfied with that order of the trial Court awarding a specific amount of Rs. 1 0 instead of giving share in the properties the plaintiff-appellant approached the District Court Bulsar at Navsari by way of Regular Civil Appeal no. 3 of 1978 and the learned District Judge by his order dated 15-3-1980 dismissed the ap

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top