SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Guj) 123

A.N.SURTI
KALURAM BHERUJI – Appellant
Versus
BAI PARVATI WIFE OF MAHAVIRSINGH KHUSHALSINGH. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.N.JADEJA, M.C.PATEL, P.B.MAJUMDAR

A. N. SURTI, J.

( 1 ) IN extremely unfortunate circumstances this matter has come up before me in revision.

( 2 ) I will very briefly indicate the circumstances under which this matter has come up before me for disposal.

( 3 ) AN eviction decree was obtained by the plaintiff against the peti- tioner who was the tenant of the suit premises at the relevant time. After the eviction decree was obtained an appeal was filed be the tenant which came up for disposal before the Bench of Court of Small Causes at Ahmedabad.

( 4 ) WHEN the appeal was heard by the Appellate Bench of Small Causes Court at Ahmedabad on behalf of the tenant a pursis was given to the Division Bench of Court of Small Causes and in that pursis it was clearly stated that if four years time was given to vacate the suit premises the petitioner-tenant would not take any of the contentions raised by him in the appeal.

( 5 ) THE Appellate Bench of the Court of Small Causes without any tittle of jurisdiction for reducing the said period reduced the aforesaid period from four years to three years and confirmed the eviction decree passed by the learned trial Judge.

( 6 ) IT is unfortunate that after the disposal of the appeal














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top