SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Guj) 162

D.H.SHUKLA, S.B.MAJMUDAR
ANANTRAY LALJI PANDYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.M.THAKKAR, S.T.MEHTA

D. H. SHUKLA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant Anantray Lalji Pandya was the accused in Special Criminal Case No. 1 of 1979 in the Court of the learned Special Judge Rajkot District Rajkot. He stood charged for the offence punishable under sec. 161 of the Indian Penal Code and sec. 5 (2) read with sec. 5 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 1947 and was also charged under sec. 465 of the Indian Penal Code. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

( 2 ) THE Prosecution case briefly stated is as under: The accused was serving as a Revenue Circle Inspector in the Office of Mamlatdar at Jetpur at the relevant time (December 19/01/1979 and his duties as a Circle Inspector inter alia were to prepare a Rojkam alias a Panchnama of the property for the purpose of issuing solvency certificate.

( 3 ) COMPLAINANT Shri Vrajlal Nathabhai Ranpuria is a Diploma-holder in Mechanical Engineering and was doing his business in electrical goods at Virpur and the complainant was also keeping electrical contracts of Gujarat Electricity Board. In the course of his business he had filled in a tender for the installation of electric poles and lines at Lakhapadar Village in Amreli District. It was found that the































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top