SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Guj) 158

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :A.M.AHMADI
HUKUMAT RAI - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
S.C.A. 1804 of 1978
Decided On : 12/02/1981

Advocates Appeared: H.B.SHAH, M.M.JADEJA

Headnote:

Costitution of India – Article 226 - Petitioner as the District Family Planning Medical Officer in Class I in the pay scale of Rs. 500-1250 on probation for a period of two years - The petitioner completed his probation period and was confirmed in service in the said post - Thereafter by a letter dated 15/09/1975 Annexure VIII the petitioner tendered his resignation with effect - Instead of giving one months notice as required by the relevant Rules he deposited one months salary in the Government Treasury at Surat in lieu of notice - After the receipt of this letter a reply Annexure IX was received from the office of the Director of Health Services stating that the notice pay deposited by the petitioner by challan was insufficient as it was not inclusive of all allowances and that till the balance was paid - The resignation could not be forwarded to the Government for acceptance. - The petitioner instead of depositing the balance of the amount as required by the aforesaid letter decided to withdraw his resignation as is clear from the communication Annexure XI - By the said letter addressed to the Director of Health Services the petitioner in no uncertain terms stated that he withdrew the resignation tendered by him by his letter - He also mentioned in the said letter that he was entitled to withdraw his resignation – Held , In the instant case as the resignation was withdrawn before it was actually received by the appointing authority which alone could accept or reject the resignation or. permit it to become effective by efflux of time there is no merit in the contention that the resignation once dispatched could not be withrawn - Not like a bullet which cannot be withdrawn once fired - Therefore court have no hesitation in reaching the conclusion that the petitioner was entitled to withdraw his resignation before the appointing authority either accepted or rejected it or permitted it to become effective by efflux of time - Advocate for the petitioner very fairly stated that having regard to the circumstances of the case the petition does not claim back wages or seniority but should be allowed continuity in service for the purpose of retirement benefits - Court think this suggestion made is very fair and needs to be accepted - Respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner in service forthwith - Petitioner will not be entitled to back wages or seniority over those who are presently in the cadre but he will be allowed continuity in service without break for the purpose of retirement benefits in future - Petition allowed.

A. M. AHMADI, J.

( 1 ) ON selection by the Gujarat Public Service Commission the petitioner was appointed on probation as a Medical Officer Class II in Gujarat Public Health Service in the pay scale of Rs. 425-850. In course of time he successfully completed the probation period and was allowed to cross the Efficiency Bar with effect from 1/03/1971 vide Annexure H to the petition. It then appears that by an order dated 18/03/1978 Annexure IV the Government was pleased to appoint the petitioner as the District Family Planning Medical Officer in Class I in the pay scale of Rs. 500-1250 on probation for a period of two years. The petitioner completed his probation period and was confirmed in service in the said post. Thereafter by a letter dated 15/09/1975 Annexure VIII the petitioner tendered his resignation with effect from 16/09/1975. Instead of giving one months notice as required by the relevant Rules he deposited one months salary in the Government Treasury at Surat in lieu of notice. In the said letter of resignation he stated that no departmental inquiry was pending against him and no Government dues were outstanding as on that date. This letter of resignation was addressed to the Director of Health Services (Health Section) Public Health Department Government of Gujarat. After the receipt of this letter a reply dated 25/11/1976 Annexure IX was received from the office of the Director of Health Services stating that the notice pay deposited by the petitioner by challan was insufficient as it was not inclusive of all allowances and that till the balance was paid. the resignation could not be forwarded to the Government for acceptance. It thus becomes clear from this letter written on behalf of the Director of Health Services that the petitioners letter of resignation was not forwarded to the Government that is the appointing authority as it did not comply with the relevant rules in that the notice pay deposited by the petitioner fell short of the allowance received by the petitioner at the relevant point of time. The petitioner instead of depositing the balance of the amount as required by the aforesaid letter of 25/11/1976 decided to withdraw his resignation as is clear from the communication dated 18/01/1977 Annexure XI. By the said letter addressed to the Director of Health Services the petitioner in no uncertain terms stated that he withdrew the resignation tendered by him by his letter dated 15/09/1975. He also mentioned in the said letter that he was entitled to withdraw his resignation because it had not been accepted as yet by the appointing authority as he had failed to deposit the balance of the amount as directed by the communication dated 25/11/1976. It appears that it was only after the receipt of this letter from the petitioner that the Director forwarded his letter of resignation to the Government for acceptance on 28/01/1977 vide paragraph 11 of the affidavit-in-reply of Shri C. M. Kothari dated 17th March 1981. From the the above facts two things clearly emerge namely (i) the letter of resignation was not forwarded to the appointing authority; and (ii) it was forwarded for acceptance to the appointing authority for the first time after the petitioner had written the letter of 18/01/1977 withdrawing the resignation.

( 2 ) THE governing Rule is Rule 33-A of the Bombay Civil Services Rules as amended by the third amendment of 1974. The relevant part of Rule 33-A reads as under:"33 (1) (a) A Government servant may at any time resign from the services of the State by giving a notice of one month in writing to the appointing authority:provided that in the case of a temporary servant who has put in service of less than one year the period of such notice shall be one week. (B) xxx xxx xxx (2) The resignation tendered by a Government servant shall be effective from the date on which it is accepted by the appointing authority; but if it is not accepted before the expiry of the period of notice for resignation to be g






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top