Gujarat High Court
Judgename :D.H.SHUKLA, S.B.MAJMUDAR
State of Gujarat - Appellant
Versus
SHASHIKANT KESHAVLAL PARMAR - Respondent
S.C.A. 1 of 1981
Decided On : 01/19/1982
The accused was a seasoned person and not an immature youth. At the time of the incident, he was aged 28 years, and he had seen life and the vicissitude thereof.
(2) The accused had a pre-determined mind to destory each and every member of its family. The way the accused attacked the innocent inmates on that fateful evening shows that he had no compunction.
(3) The method and manner of perpetrating the crime speak volumes of the depraved mental condition of the accused.
(4) Economic distress is a mere excuse on the part of the accused. The accused appeard to be suffering from self induced sense of injustice.
(5) The accused had diabolically designed and had meticulously planned and had effectively executed his object of exterminating the inmates of house.
(6) The motive of the crime was there in attitude and a false sense of taking revenge on H. The attack shows a deliberate design harboured by the accused to give maximum pain and suffering to H by killing his innocent family members.
(7) The accused took it otherwise and thought of making a deliberate plan spread over a period of time to perpetrate the crime in question. Thus the act on his part was a highly thought over and preplanned act.
(8) The accused had acted with fiendish ferocity and with a blood curdling cruety. Having inflicted five fatal blows on the old man and having given two knife blows to A, the accused pounced upon a child aged four years, and stabbed with such force on her abdomen that he instantaneously died.
(9) The conduct of the accused subsequent to the crime clearly did not reflect any remorse.
(10) He is a veritable wolf, as can be bracketed in the dictum, that he is as much misplaced in civilised society.
( 1 ) THIS Confirmation Case along with the companion Criminal Appeal by the original accused arise out of order of conviction and sentence dated 31/07/1981 rendered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Rajkot in Sessions Case No. 57 of 1980. By his aforesaid decision the learned Additional Sessions Judge has convicted the original accused Shashikant Keshavlal Parmar under sec. 302 of the Indian Penal Code for committing triple murders of Gaurishanker Ishwarlal Dave Ashaben Niranjan Dave and Vibha Narendra Dave. He has also convicted the accused for offence punishable under sec. 307 (2) of the Indian Penal Code for having caused serious injuries to prosecution witness Janak Kanaiyalal. He has also convicted the accused for the offence punishable under sec. 324 of the Indian Penal Code for having caused knife injuries to prosecution witness Kanaiyalal Jagjivan. The learned trial Judge has also found the accused guilty of an offence of criminal trespass punishable under sec. 452 of the Indian Penal Code for having committed criminal trespass in the house of Hasubhai Dave after taking preparation for committing the offence which would be punishable with imprisonment. He has also convicted the accused for the offence punishable under sec. 135 of the Bombay Police Act for contravention of the notification issued under sec. 37 (1) of the Bombay Police Act 1951
( 2 ) FOR the offence punishable under sec. 302 of the Indian Penal Code for three different murders the learned trial Judge has sentenced the accused to death and has directed that the accused should be hanged by neck till his death. That is of course subject to its confirmation by this Court.
( 3 ) THE accused Shashikant Keshavlal Parmar who is the appellant in Criminal Appeal No. 826 of 1981 and who will be referred to by us in the later part of this judgment as the accused was charged under secs. 302 307 324 452 of the Indian Penal Code and under src. 135 of the Bombay Police Act 1951 for having caused fatal injuries by two knives to deceased Gaurishanker Ishwarlal Dave Ashaben Niranjan Dave and minor infant Vibha Narendra Dave as well as having caused severe injuries to Janak Kanaiyalal Pandya and a simple hurt to Kanaiyalal Jagjivan Pandya on 17/10/1980 at about 7-45 p. m. in a building named and styled as Yogesh belonging to Advocate Hasubhai Gaurishanker Dave of Rajkot situated in Gaekwadi Plot area of Rajkot City. As revealed from the prosecution case against the accused it is found that in the twilight hours of 17/10/1980 which was the eighth day of Navratra known as Havanasthami a grim tragedy struck the household of one Hasubhai Gaurishanker Dave a practicing Advocate at Rajkot Labour Court Bar who was at the relevant time the President of the said Bar. In the process three innocent lives were lost and two neighbors got injured. Those innocent victims who lost their lives were Gaurishanker Ishwarlal Dave the aged father of Advocate Hasubhai who was reciting prayers at the relevant time in the Pooja room of Yogesh building the minor infant girl Vibha Narendrabhai niece of Advocate Hasubhai and Ashaben Niranjanbhai wife of the brother of Hasubhai. Two neighbours who were staying opposite and who came to rescue the inmates of the house from the attack by the assailant accused also got injured in the process and these neighbours were Janak Kanaiyalal Pandya and Kanaiyalal Jagjivan Pandya. The injuries received by Janak Kanaiyalal Pandya on the vital part of his body practically landed him in the jaws of death but by a stroke of good-luck he survived. The prosecution case further is that the District Magistrate Rajkot had issued a Notification under sec. 37 (1) of the Bombay Police Act prohibiting persons from carrying dangerous Weapons like knives and in violation of the said notification the accused had armed himself with deadly knives at the relevant time and hence he was guilty of an offence punishable under sec. 135 of the Bombay Police Act. It
SupremeToday
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.