SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Guj) 46

N.H.BHATT
GUJARAT ELECRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
MAHESHKUMAR and COMPANY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.R.SHAH, S.B.VAKIL

N. H. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is a revision application by the original defendant of the Civil Suit no. 112 of 1981 pending in the Court of Civil Judge (J. D.) at Gandhinagar. The opponent herein is M/s. Maheshkumar and Co. the plaintiff who have filed the aforesaid suit for a declaration that the contract of lifting fly-ash alleged to be entered into between the parties was in operation for a period of three years and the plaintiff wanted an injunction restraining the defendant the Gujarat Electricity Board from disturbing the plaintiff while lifting the fly-ash from Gandhinagar Power Station belonging to the defendant Electricity Board. Along with the suit an application ex. 5 for an interim injunction was given by the plaintiffs. The learned trial Judge after hearing both the sides had refused to grant that injunction. Being aggrieved by the said order of the learned trial Judge the Misc. Appeal No. 118/81 had come to be filed by the original plaintiff seeking the injunction to operate till the disposal of the suit. The learned Extra Assistant Judge Mr. H. P. Hathi by his impugned order held as follows:"appeal is allowed and respondent defendant is restrained from disallowing the ap
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top