N.H.BHATT
HIMATLAL MAGANLAL – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHCHANDRA NATVERLAL – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS is an appeal preferred by the original defendant No. 1 of the Civil Suit No. 2306 of 1969 decreed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court 2 Court Ahmedabad in favour of the present respondent No. 1 the original plaintiff who had succeeded to get a declaration from the learned Judge that the document of sale dated 19-6-51 Ex. 74 on the record which was executed by the defendant No. 2 his father in favour of the defendant No. 1 (the present appellant who is his uncle was to the extent of his 1/4th share not binding the plaintiff. As a corollary the learned Judge further declared that the plaintiff was entitled to receive 1/4th share from the income of the property which admittedly was let out on long term basis on earlier occasion in favour of the original defendant No. 3 the New Asarva Manufacturing Co. Ltd. which was liable to pay only Rs. 1041. 00 as the annual rent.
( 2 ) ). The plaintiffs case was that the said sale deed executed by his father the defendant No. 2 on the record was without consideration and alternatively for a consideration which was tainted and therefore it did not bind the plaintiff who attained majority for the first time on 16-1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.