SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Guj) 108

N.H.BHATT
HIMATLAL MAGANLAL – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHCHANDRA NATVERLAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.J.DESAI, B.J.SHELAT, H.B.SHAH

N. H. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THIS is an appeal preferred by the original defendant No. 1 of the Civil Suit No. 2306 of 1969 decreed by the learned Judge of the City Civil Court 2 Court Ahmedabad in favour of the present respondent No. 1 the original plaintiff who had succeeded to get a declaration from the learned Judge that the document of sale dated 19-6-51 Ex. 74 on the record which was executed by the defendant No. 2 his father in favour of the defendant No. 1 (the present appellant who is his uncle was to the extent of his 1/4th share not binding the plaintiff. As a corollary the learned Judge further declared that the plaintiff was entitled to receive 1/4th share from the income of the property which admittedly was let out on long term basis on earlier occasion in favour of the original defendant No. 3 the New Asarva Manufacturing Co. Ltd. which was liable to pay only Rs. 1041. 00 as the annual rent.

( 2 ) ). The plaintiffs case was that the said sale deed executed by his father the defendant No. 2 on the record was without consideration and alternatively for a consideration which was tainted and therefore it did not bind the plaintiff who attained majority for the first time on 16-1








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top