( 1 ) THESE three revision applications are filed by the petitioners who claim to be in possession of their respective premises against the common opponent. The three revisions are heard together at the request of the learned Advocates of the parties and are being disposed of by this common judgment. The dispute pertains to the property belonging to one Dahyagar Hiragar who had filed Civil Suit No. 66 of 1963 against his wife Bai Savita and his son named Jitendra Dahyagar as well as some other persons who claim to be the assignees or transferes of the said Bai Savita and Jitendra Dahyagar. The said suit No. 66 of 1963 was heard and disposed of on 30 67 against which first appeal No. 721/61 was filed in this court which was also heard and disposed of by the judgment and decree dated 13-4-1973. The judgment and decree of this court was challenged in the Supreme Court which confirmed the said judgment and decree in 1978 whereby Dahyagar Hiragar was held to be the owner of the suit properties and that his wife Bai Savita and his son Jitendra were held to have no right title or interest whatsoever in respect of the suit properties

( 2 ) DURING the tendency of the said li