SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Guj) 163

N.H.BHATT
VIKRAM K. SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: JAYANT M.PANCHAL, K.N.RAVAL, M.S.SHAH

N. H. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition has been filed by about seven Doctors looking forward to prosecute post graduate studies further because their chances of getting subjects of their choice because of the impugned resolution of the Government have receded. The prayers in the petition are as follow:" (A) to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ direction or order directing the respondents to prepare the merit list of persons eligible to be appointed as residents on the basis that those who pass the final M. B. B. S. examination at the first attempt should be given first preference and accordingly to suitably modify Rule 8. 2 and Rule 8. 3 of the Rules governing appointment as residents. (AA) to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction directing the Gujarat University to frame the Rules governing the selection for postgraduate studies and directing the third respondent not to make selection for postgraduate studies on the basis of the Rules contained in the Government resolution of the Health and Family Welfare Department dt. 25-5-82 for the appointment of residen




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top