SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Guj) 157

M.P.THAKKAR, R.C.MANKAD
C – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: C.K.TAKVANI

M. P. THAKKAR, J.

( 1 ) A public officer convicted for accepting illegal gratification in respect of his official duty under sec. 110 and under sec. 120 read with sec. 34 of the Indian Penal Code has invoked our extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in order to seek a direction calling upon the Bar Council to enroll him as a member of the Bar without waiting for the lapse of the period of 2 years after his release from imprisonment as enjoined by sec. 24a of the Advocates Act 1961 (Does 2 years waiting make him suitable for enrollment as a member of the Noble Profession is a question which causes mental turmoil to which me will give sent in passing after a for moments ).

( 2 ) SEC. 24a may now be placed under spotlight:"24 Disqualification for enrollment (I) No Person shall be admitted as an advocate on a State Roll (A) if he is convicted of all offence involving moral turpitude; (B) if he is convicted of an offence under the provisions of the Untouchability (Offences) Act 1955provided that the disqualification for enrollment as aforesaid shall cease to have effect after a period of two years has elapsed since his Release. (II) Nothing contained i




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top