SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Guj) 179

D.H.SHUKLA
SWAMI MICK MONASSAN – Appellant
Versus
POPATLAL P. MISTRY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.SHAH, ASHA H.GUPTA, JOSHIPURA BAKUL

D. H. SHUKLA, J.

( 1 ) THE applicant Swami Mick Monassan is accused No. 1 in a Criminal Case No. 2284 of 1982 filed by the complainant Popatlal P. Mistry opponent No. 2 herein before the Metropolitan Magistrate (Court No. 15) at Ahmedabad for the alleged offences under secs. 5 (1) (b) and 5 (1) (c) of the Suppression of Immoral Traffic in Women and Girls Act 1956 (Act No. 104 of 1956) which will hereinafter be referred to as the said Act. Accused No. 2 in the said Criminal Case is one Guru Freddy. Accused Nos. 1 and 2 are residents of village Gurukula named Island Home Narayana Gurukula Foundation Ramanthali P. O. 670308 Cannanore District Kerala. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate has passed an order dated 1-9-1982 for the issuance of the summons to both the accused under sec. 5 (1) (b) and 5 (1) (c) of the said Act. Accused No. 1 who will hereinafter be referred to as the applicant having been aggrieved by the aforesaid order has filed the present Criminal Misc. Application under sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 to quash the process.

( 2 ) ). It is necessary to have a perspective of the allegations of the complainant in order to ultimately appreciate the legality o

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top