SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Guj) 32

S.B.MAJMUDAR
GENERAL MANAGER, WESTERN RAILWAY, BOMBAY – Appellant
Versus
LALA NANDA – Respondent


S. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal filed by the appellant railway administration under sec. 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) has been placed before me by the orders of the learned Chief Justice on account of difference of opinion between two learned Judges of this Court - N. H. Bhatt J. and I. C. Bhatt J. who earlier heard this appeal in a Division Bench pursuant to an earlier order of reference of this appeal to a larger bench. It may be stated that by coincidence even the earlier order of reference of this appeal to a larger bench was made by me on 6-5-81 when I heard this appeal initially for final hearing as a single Judge.

( 2 ) A few relevant facts leading to the present proceedings may now be noted.

( 3 ) THE appellant railway administration is the employer while the respondent is its employee. The respondent suffered an employment injury while he was working in the railway establishment of the appellant at Kota. He suffered this employment injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment. It totally destroyed the vision of his left eye. The incident in question happened on 11-10-71 when the respondent was sent































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top