S.B.MAJMUDAR
GENERAL MANAGER, WESTERN RAILWAY, BOMBAY – Appellant
Versus
LALA NANDA – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal filed by the appellant railway administration under sec. 30 of the Workmens Compensation Act 1923 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) has been placed before me by the orders of the learned Chief Justice on account of difference of opinion between two learned Judges of this Court - N. H. Bhatt J. and I. C. Bhatt J. who earlier heard this appeal in a Division Bench pursuant to an earlier order of reference of this appeal to a larger bench. It may be stated that by coincidence even the earlier order of reference of this appeal to a larger bench was made by me on 6-5-81 when I heard this appeal initially for final hearing as a single Judge.
( 2 ) A few relevant facts leading to the present proceedings may now be noted.
( 3 ) THE appellant railway administration is the employer while the respondent is its employee. The respondent suffered an employment injury while he was working in the railway establishment of the appellant at Kota. He suffered this employment injury which arose out of and in the course of his employment. It totally destroyed the vision of his left eye. The incident in question happened on 11-10-71 when the respondent was sent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.