SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Guj) 102

B.K.MEHTA, R.J.SHAH
GUJARAT ELECRICITY BOARD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.S.NANAVATI, R.R.SHAH

R. J. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) IN the above petition the Gujarat Electricity Board has challenged the directions contained in the order dated 15/01/1979 passed by the second respondent and has prayed that the same be quashed and set aside. State of Gujarat is respondent No. 1.

( 2 ) ACCORDING to the petitioner it is engaged in the business of generation supply and distribution of electrical energy and for that purpose it has thermal power stations at several places. At the thermal power stations the work of generation of electricity is done. The petitioner has also got several sub-stations where conversion of high voltage into low voltage is done with the help of transformers and other devices which are installed at such sub-stations. No generation of electricity is done at the sub-stations. The petitioner contends that the sub-stations whether big or small are not factories and therefore the provisions of the Factories Act 1948 cannot apply to the substations. Since the office of the Factories Inspector was raising an objection in this connection and was insisting that the said sub-stations should be registered as factories even through no manufacturing activity was done at such sub-stations
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top