SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Guj) 112

A.S.QURESHI
PRAFULCHANDRA KANTILAL BHOJAK – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHCHANDRA PHARELAL SHAH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.C.SHAH, S.N.SHELAT

A. S. QURESHI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two appeals are filed by the present appellant who was the original complainant. The present respondent No. 1 wa the accused in the Summary Case Nos. 1065/78 and 39 of 1979 for the alleged offence of carrying out illegal construction without the permission of Patan Municipality and therefore punishable under sec. 155 (7) of the Gujarat Municipalities Act 1963 (Act XXXIV of 1964) hereinafter referred to as the Act. According to the complainant who is an employee of the Patan Municipality the accused had-illegally constructed some additional portion in his house. After recording the evidence the learned Magistrate was satisfied that no offence was committed by the accused. Hence by his judgment and order dated 7/06/1979 the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class Patan acquitted the accused in both the cases.

( 2 ) IT is not in dispute that the original accused who is respondent No. 1 in these two appeals had given an application to the Municipality on 27/01/1978 seeking permission to make additional construction in his house. It is also agreed on behalf of the Municipality that a plan was submitted with the aforesaid application. The applicant went to th








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top