SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Guj) 143

I.C.BHATT, S.L.TALATI
THAM BAHADUR GAURANG – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.J.BUDDHBHATTI, RAMESH A.MEHTA

S. L. TALATI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners are the military personnel and they are undergoing imprisonment at Sabarmati Central Prison Ahmedabad and they have now filed this petition challenging their trial and the conviction by the Court of Martial and their prayers are for the issuance of a writ of Habeas Corpus or any other appropriate writ order or direction and further declaring that secs. 124 and 125 of the Army Act 1950 are as unconstitutional and violative of Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India and further to declare Rule 61 of the Army Rules as unconstitutional and ultra vires Articles 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India.

( 2 ) IN the title to the petition begins however by mentioning Arts. 14 20 and 21 of the Constitution of India and it is stated that the petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) I he facts as they appear are that on 8/9-10-1979 in Leh (Ladakh) Kashmir an accident occurred as a result an inquiry was started against 12 persons and ultimately charge-sheet Annexure A was submitted against 12 persons on 16-8-80. It appears that they were charged that after having heard a seditions speech by JC- 50727 Sub-Bhim Bahadur R




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top