SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Guj) 150

A.P.RAVANI
PRAKASH KAUR WD/o. AJITSING HARNAMSING – Appellant
Versus
SOHANSINGH KHADAKSING – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: DIPAK K.TRIVEDI, MAHESH C.BHATT

A. P. RAVANI, J.

( 1 ) THESE two applications have been filed against an order dated 4/07/1983 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Court No. 9 Ahmedabad directing that opponents herein-original accused Nos. 1 and 2 charged for offences under sections 302 337 324 426 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code be released on bail. The impugned order was passed below an application for bail which was submitted on 1/07/1983 by the accused. Misc. Criminal Application No. 1513 of 1983 has been filed by the State of Gujarat while Misc. Criminal Application No. 1363 of 1983 has been filed by the original informant Smt. Prakash Kaur widow of Ajitsing Harnamsing. In both the applications it is prayed that the order passed by the trial court granting bail be cancelled.

( 2 ) IT is neither necessary nor it is advisable to go into the minute details of prosecution case at this stage. As per the F. I. R. given by the widow of the deceased victim Ajitsing Harnamsing within about four hours time after the alleged commission of the offence it becomes clear that when the deceased was taking food at his place he was dealt with by a sword blow alleged to have been given by Tarasing alias Avtarsing Soha











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top