SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Guj) 159

B.K.MEHTA, S.A.SHAH
SAFAL KELVANI MANDAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.D.Vyas, R.M.VIN

B. K. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) BY this group of 40 petitions the respective petitioners who represent the private management of primary approved schools separating within the jurisdiction of different Municipalities or Distict Panchayats in the State challenge the amendments in the Bombay Primary Education Rules 1949 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules of 1949 seeking to regulate the matter of recognition of such schools and their continuance by linking them inter alia with compliance of Schedule F containing the Model Standing Orders governing the teachers-management relations. In all these petitions the challenge to the amendments in the rules is founded on the same contentions though in three of them namely Sp. C. A. Nos. 1353 of 1978 982 of 1978 and 820 of 1978 over and above the common reliefs sought in this group the individual orders or actions of the Government are also challenged. The nature of the school management in the majority of the petitions is by and through public trusts and in a few of them it is a proprietory managment.

( 2 ) SP. C. A. Nos. 820 of 1978 972 of 1979 and 1323 of 1979 are schools run by religious minorities. Except this peculiar feature the contentions urge














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top