SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Guj) 231

S.L.TALATI
KULSAMBIBI D/o. SHAH MOHAMED NOOR MOHAMED – Appellant
Versus
NOOR AHMED NOOR MOHAMED – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.P.Vyas, P.V.Nanavati

S. L. TALATI, J.

( 1 ) FOR the purpose of deciding these appeals it is not necessary to state all facts. The reason is that all facts are stated in the judgment of City Civil Court and those facts are admitted.

( 2 ) THE appeals are filed challenging the order passed by the Judge City Civil Court (Court No. 3) Ahmedabad in Civil Suit No. 3615 of 1973. The application below exh. 546 was decided by the learned City Civil Court Judge on 23-9-1983.

( 3 ) ONE Noor Ahmed Noor Mohmed was the plaintiff and Kulsambibi Ibrahimbhai and Usmanbhai were the three defendants. The original suit was filed as an indigent person and it was in fact the permission to allow the original plaintiff to file the suit as an indigent person under Order 33 of the Civil Procedure Code. It was Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 452 of 1972. That application was granted and it was thereafter numbered as suit. Ad-interim injunction exh. He was issued and served on defendants Nos. 1 2 and 3. Ultimately the suit was numbered as Civil Suit No. 3615 of 1973. There was a breach of injunction order issued and therefore application exh. 546 was required to be given. Ultimately after hearing the parties the learned City C









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top