SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 16

A.P.RAVANI
LATILUNNISA USMANKHAN – Appellant
Versus
SAIYED ASHRAFALI AHMEDALI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ANIL S.DAVE, J.M.PANCHAL

A. P. RAVANI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-wife field application for maintenance under the provisions of Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The application was heard and decided by the learned Metropolitall Magistrate (Court No. 12) Ahmedabad. The learned Metropolitan Magistrate held that Opponent No. 1-husband was guilty of cruel treatment to the petitioner-wife and the petitioner wife was entitled to stay separate and claim maintenance. He therefore passed an order directing opponent No. 1- husband to pay maintenance at the rate of Rs. 200/- per month from the date of the application i. e. November 17 1982 The learned Magistrate also directed opponent No. 1-husband to pay an amount of Rs. 100/- as costs of the application. Against the judgment and order passed by the learned Magistrate the petitioner-wife as well as opponent No. 1-husband both preferred Criminal Revision Applications in the Court of learned City Sessions Judge Ahmedabad. The petitioner-wife filed application for enhancement of maintenance while opponent No 1-husband filed application praying that the order of maintenance passed by the Trial Court should be quashed a and set aside.

( 2 ) THE learned City Sess







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top