SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 54

G.T.NANAVATI
ISHVERBHAI BHAGUBHAI – Appellant
Versus
SPECIAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: S.N.SHELAT

G. T. NANAVATI, J.

( 1 ) PETITIONERS father Bhagubhai became deemed purchaser of Survey No. 18 of village Karanj Taluka Choryasi District Surat by virtue of sec. 32 read with sec. 32g of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act 1948 (hereafter referred to as the Tenancy Act ). On his death his heirs (1) Ishverbhai (2) Haribhai (3) Champaklal (4) Shantaben and (5) Gangaben became the joint owners of the said property. By a deed of relinquishment dated 1-12-1964 the other co- owners relinquished their respective shares in favour of the petitioners. On an application made by the petitioner a mutation entry was made to that effect in the revenue records. However the Mamlatdar by his order dated 30-5-1967 cancelled that entry on the ground that the transfer was void according to sec. 43 of the Tenancy Act. That order was confirmed in appeal by the Assistant Collector. The petitioner then filed a further appeal before the Collector who held that second appeal did not lie; and therefore treated it as a revision application under Rule 108 of the Bombay Land Revenue Rules. He confirmed the order passed by the Assistant Collector and dismissed the revision application. The petitioner the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top