SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 72

V.V.BEDARKAR
SHANTILAL NAGARDAS SHAH – Appellant
Versus
VORA RAHIMBHAI JUSABHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.S.CHAMPANERI, SHANTILAL N.SHAH

V. V. BEDARKAR, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is filed by a litigant who has been unsuccessful in getting the order under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) for the alleged nuisance and whose revision before the Sessions Court also failed.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner is that adjoining to his house respondents Nos. 1 2 and 3 are running a mini oil mill which in local terms is called a Ghani run by electricity. It is the case of the petitioner that due to this Ghani there are vibrations and continuous nuisance to the members of his family which ultimately endanger his health.

( 3 ) INITIALLY the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate Limbdi who was in charge earlier granted ad interim injunction against the running of the said Ghani but later on after full hearing the succeeding Sub-Divisional Magistrate dismissed the application. The revision before the Sessions Court was also dismissed. The petitioner is present in Court in person and it is his contention that his house is in danger and therefore the Court should consider. The learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate considered that this being a








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top