SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 125

A.M.AHMADI
NATHEKHAN SOJALKHAN BIHARI – Appellant
Versus
MAMLATDAR,vadgam – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.A.SAYED, S.P.DAVE

A. M. AHMADI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners of these two petitions are real brothers. They inherited lands bearing Survey No. 73 Part 74 75 87 115 117 171 172 and 173 of village Mepada and Survey No. 137 of village Mengal totally admeasuring 87 acres and 37 gunthas. Each brother had one-half share in the said lands according to the Muslim personal law by which they were admittedly governed. Therefore each brother owned 43 acres and 38. 5 gunthas of land forming part of the aforesaid revenue survey numbers.

( 2 ) BOTH the brothers were living separately with their respective families at the relevant point of time. The petitioner Nathekhans family consisted of himself his wife two minor sons two minor daughters and a widowed mother. Petitioner Mojamkhans family consisted of his wife four un-married daughters and one minor son. Thus each brother had seven members in the family and both of them lived with their respective families under separate roofs. The ceiling area for Jirayat land was fixed at 39 acres. Thus each brother held 4 acres and 38. 5 gunthas in excess of the normal ceiling area. These facts are not in dispute.

( 3 ) THE authorities below including the Revenue Tribunal came to








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top