SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 152

S.A.SHAH
CHUDASAMA SHAMBHAJI KALUBHA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: S.R.DIVETIA, SHARAD D.SHAH

S. A. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THE Advocates appearing on behalf of the petitioners in the respective petitions have submitted that in this group of petitions the main and common question that arises is with respect to interpretation of section 6 (3-B) of the Gujarat Bands Ceiling Act 1960 (Gujarat Act No. XXVII of 1961) (hereinafter referred to as the Ceiling Act ) and therefore they may be disposed of by a common judgment without entering into facts of each petition because if they succeed in their interpretation it will be necessary to remand the matters to the authority below for deciding the ceiling area in each individual case. I have therefore heard all these petitions together and they are disposed of by this common judgment.

( 2 ) FOR the purpose of appreciating the contentions of the parties regarding the interpretation of section 6 (3-B) of the Act I would refer to the facts of Special Civil Application No. 1000 of 1978. The petitioner of the said petition was the owner of lands admeasuring 57 acres 9 gunthas in village Pipli Taluka Dhandhuka District Ahmedabad. He was also the owner of lands admeasuring 12 acres 27 gunthas in village Barhanpur Taluka Dhandhuka Dist. Ahmedabad. Min








































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top