SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 177

S.B.MAJMUDAR, S.L.TALATI
MOHAN VASTA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: GIRISH D.BHATT, P.M.THAKKAR

S. B. MAJMUDAR, S. L. TALATI, J.

( 1 ) MOHAN Vasta has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order of the Special Land Acquisition Officer Rajkot dated 14-6-1977. The land of the petitioner bearing survey no. 63\2 was acquired by the respondent. The award was passed on 10 and the petitioner was paid the amount of Rs. 3302. 82 as compensation. That amount was accepted under protest. He thereafter presented an application to the Collection for reference under sec. 18 (2) of the Land Acquisition Act. As this petition was not submitted within a period of 45 days as provided by sec. 18 of the Land Acquisition Act he submitted an application to condone the delay. The ground stated was that his wife was sick and was suffering from T. B. and there severe heavy rains. He produced the medical certificate and also an affidavit of a respectable person from the village. The Collector after considering the matter came to the conclusion that though the wife of the petitioner was suffering from T. B. . the petitioner was not suffering and the distance from village Kothariya to Rajkot was 8 to 10 Kms. and after September there serve no rains.











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top