SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 201

A.S.QURESHI, B.S.KAPADIA
JASMAT PARSHOTTAM GANESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: S.R.DIVETIA, Sirish Joshi

B. S. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THE above mentioned Revision Applications have been filed by the original accused Nos. 6 4 1 5 and 2 respectively against the order passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Junagadh in Criminal Appeals Nos. 70 73 83 and 78/82 filed by them against the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Junagadh in the Criminal Case No. 52 of 1981.

( 2 ) THE learned Chief Judicial Magistrate by his order dated 19/06/1982 in the aforesaid case had convicted the accused No. 1 2 4 5 and 6 for offence punishable under sec. 135 (1) (b) (i) of the Customs Act and passed the order of seven years R. I. and a fine of Rs. 1000. 00 and in default of the payment of fine to undergo further R. I. for one year against each of the accused. The learned Additional Sessions Judge after hearing the aforesaid appeals partly allowed the appeals confirming the order of conviction passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Junagadh against the aforesaid accused and modified the order of sentence as under:"for the reasons aforesaid each appellant/accused is sentenced to suffer R. I. for 42 months and to pay fine of Rs. 20 0 and in default of fi













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top