SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 256

M.B.SHAH
K. C. SAKSENA, ASSISTANT COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS – Appellant
Versus
VIRBHADRASINHJI K. GOHEL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HARUBHAI MEHTA, JETHAMALANI RAM

M. B. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THE respondent No. 1 along with other accused was charged for the offence punishable under section 135 of the Customs Act 1962 on the allegation that in pursuance of conspiracy prohibited articles such as wrist watches foreign cloth foreign fountain-pens and other articles were brought and was in any way concerned in carrying removing depositing harbouring keeping concealing selling or purchasing or in any other manner dealing with such prohibited goods which he knew or had reason to believe were liable to confiscation under section 111 of the Customs Act and for the offences punishable under section 13 (1) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973 and section 5 of the Import and Export Control Act read with section 120-B of the Indian Penal Code by the Chief Judicial Magistrate Amreli in Criminal Case No. 1061 of 1979.

( 2 ) AGAINST the said order of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate Amreli framing charge against the respondent No. 1 and other accused respondent No. 1 had preferred Criminal Revision Application No. 35/82 before the Sessions Judge Amreli. The other accused had also preferred Criminal Revision Applications Nos. 30/82 and 39/82. I am not co




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top