SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Guj) 278

M.B.SHAH
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: GIRISH D.BHATT, RAJNI H.MEHTA

M. B. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) BEING aggrieved and dissatisfied by the judgment and order dated 21/06/1984 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Vadodara. in Criminal Revision Application No. 15/84 quashing and setting aside the judgment and order dated 20/12/1983 passed by the 5th Joint Civil Judge (J. D.) and Judicial Magistrate First Class Vadodara in Criminal Case No. 14741/83 the petitioners have liked this Miscellaneous Application under section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code for quashing and setting aside the judgment and order passed by the Sessions Court and in the alternative for quashing and setting aside the process issued by the Judicial Magistrate First Class in the Criminal Case No. 14741/83.

( 2 ) AGAINST the said judgment and order opponent No. 1 preferred the revision application before the Sessions Court. The said revision application came up for hearing before the learned Additional Sessions Judge who arrived at the conclusion that once the process was issued the Court had no jurisdiction to drop the proceedings. He also ordered that it would be open to the petitioners to file an appropriate application for quashing and setting aside the process issued by the learned




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top