J.P.DESAI
HABIBULLA KALYANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) "the petitioners in these two petitions are accused in Special Case No. 19 of 1984 of the Court of Special Judge Ahmedabad. Petitioner Habibulla Kalyani was serving as Class I Officer in the Sales Tax Department while petitioner Haribhai Patel was serving as Sales Tax Inspector. * * * * * * are reproduced below: * * * * vious sanction". x x x x x x (B) in the case of a person who is employed in connection with the affairs of a State and is not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the State Government; (b) in the case of any other person of the authority competent to remove him from his office. Petitioner Habibulla being a Class I Gazetted Officer is not removable from his office save by or with the sanction of the State Government while petitioner Haribhai being a non-gazetted officer could be removed by a competent authority other than the Government. A proper sanction under sec. 6 (1 ) (b) would be required to be issued by the State Government so far as petitioner Habibulla is concerned while sanction of the Sales Tax Commissioner would be a valid one so far as petitioner Haribhai is concerned because he can be removed from service by the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.