SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Guj) 44

B.S.KAPADIA
HEMANTKUMAR DAHYABHAI PRAJAPATI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: DIPAK K.TRIVEDI, G.A.PANDIT

B. S. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THE present revision application is filed by the original accused against the order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge Ahmedabad in the criminal Appeal No. 142 of 1984 wherein the order of conviction under sec. 7read with sec. 16 (1) (a) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act was confirmed but he modified the order of sentence passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Court No. 6. Ahmedabad in Criminal Summary Case No. 47 of 1983 dated 30-6-1984 imposing the sentence of Simple imprisonment for six months and to pay fine of Rs. 1. 000. 00 in default to undergo further simple imprisonment for three months. The order of sentence was modified by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge and the accused was ordered to undergo simple imprisonment of one month and to pay a fine of Rs. 1 0 in default to undergo further simple imprisonment of three months.

( 2 ) THE facts of the case are that the accused-applicant is running a shop on small scale basis in the name of Meenakshi Provision Store situated near St. Xaviers High School at Gopalnagar in Memnagar area of Ahmedabad City. On 1/02/1983 at 9. 30 a. m. the Food Inspector Shr P. M.








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top