SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Guj) 40

J.P.DESAI
D. N. ANERAO – Appellant
Versus
MAHESHKUMAR KANTILAL SONI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.C.PATEL, S.R.SHAH

J. P. DESAI, J.

( 1 ) SEC. 135a of the Customs Act which is material for our purpose reads follows:-IF a person makes preparation to export any goods in contravention of the provisions of this Act and from the circumstances of the case it may be reasonably inferred that if not prevented by circumstances independent of his will he is determined to carry out his intention to commit the offence he shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to three years or with fine or with both". It will appear on reading sec. 135a that for making out a case under sec. 135a of the Customs Act against any person the prosecution has to establish that that person has made preparation to export any goods in contravention of the provisions of the Customs Act and further that from the circumstances of the case it can be reasonably inferred that if not prevented by circumstances independent of his will that person was determined to carry out his intention to commit the offence. It is therefore not enough for the prosecution to make out a case of mere preparation. It has further to make out a case that reason able inference can be drawn from the circumstances that if not prevented by c





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top