R.A.MEHTA, A.P.RAVANI
BANK OF BARODA – Appellant
Versus
TIGER ELECT. MOTORS COMPANY – Respondent
( 1 ) THIS appeal by the original plaintiff (Bank of Baroda) is directed against the judgment and decree which reads as under ;"defendants do pay Rs. 3 78 56. 41 with 9% interest from date of suit i. e. 26-9-78 till realisation with cost of suit in 10 equal annual instalments commencing from 1-1-84 with the condition that if they failed to pay any one instalment the plaintiff shall be at liberty to recover the remaining whole amount at a time". The plaintiff is at liberty to recover the decretal amount by sale of hypothecated and mortgaged properties. The plaintiff Bank is aggrieved by the direction in the decree regarding instalments as well as interest rate which is less than the contractual rate of interest.
( 2 ) RESPONDENT-DEFENDANT No. 1 is the principal debtor a Private Limited Co. Respondent No. 3 has been deleted. Respondents Nos. 2 4 and 5 are the Directors of the principal debtor Private Limited Co. and are also the guarantors. Respondent No. 2 seems to be a past director but he has also given a guarantee and that also continues. All the defendants have been held liable for the decretal amount. The suit was not a simple money suit. It was suit for recover
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.