SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Guj) 82

S.B.MAJMUDAR, I.C.BHATT
HUSEINMIYA SAFIMIYA – Appellant
Versus
HABIBSHA HASAMSHA FAKIR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: R.A.MISHRA

S. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) IN this appeal defendant No. 1 in special civil suit No. 51 of 1978 on the file of the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division) Junagadh has challenged the decree for possession passed by the learned trial Judge on 29

( 2 ) IN order to highlight the grievances voiced by the appellant through his learned Advocate before us it is profitable to have a look at the relevant facts. Respondents Nos. 1 to 4 are the original plaintiffs in the suit while respondent No. 5 is original defendant No. 3. Original plaintiffs are trustees of a registered public trust known as Pir Shiraji Sha Dargah Trust. Defendant No. 2 Khalifa Shri Mahmadsha who is since deceased was the Khalifa of the trust. It is the case of the plaintiff-trustee that defendant No. 2 was managing the institution and the lands thereof as Khalifa. After some time he started mismanaging the same. Followers of Dargah applied to the Charity Commissioner in 1963 under section 50a of the Bombay Public Trusts Act for sanctioning the scheme and for appointing trustees. The Charity Commissioner by his order dated 27-11-1964 sanctioned the scheme and appointed the plaintiffs as first trustees. Defendants appeal against









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top