A.M.AHMADI
SARDARSINGH DEVISINGH – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE SABARKANTHA DISTRICT – Respondent
( 1 ) FROM the above facts it becomes clear that the petitioner had remained absent without leave for 150 days. Being absent without leave is certainly a misconduct for which the petitioner can be visited with one of the penalties including the penalty of removal or dismissal. The question however is whether the penalty of dismissal inflicted on the petitioner is commensurate with the established guilt.
( 2 ) WHEN an authority is conferred with the power to inflict one of the several penalties such as caution or censure reprimand extra drill or duty fine stoppage of increments reduction in rank removal or dismissal it is obvious that the authority must give a serious thought to the question of choice of penalty. The choice cannot the arbitrary but arbitrary on the nature of misconduct established in a given case. Just as a road roller cannot be brought to crush a fly so also the extreme penalty of dismissal cannot be inflicted for misconduct which is not equally grave. The consequence of removal or dismissal from service are severe sometimes the entire family is ruined because another job or work may not be easy to find and therefore it is all the more necessary tha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.