SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Guj) 135

P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN, S.B.MAJMUDAR
GUJARAT MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
PRESIDING OFFICER,labour COURT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.J.JADEJA, JAYSHRI C.BHATT, N.J.MEHTA

P. R. GOKULAKRISHNAN, J.

( 1 ) THE common respondent Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation Limited in Recovery Applications Na. 2324 of 1982 etc. before the Presiding officer of the Labour Court Ahmedabad is the petitioner in all these special civil applications under Article 227 of Constitution of India. Independent recovery applications under sec. 33 (C) (2) of the Industrial Disputes Act were filed by various employees of the petitioner-Corporation to recover house rent allowance and project allowance. The petitioner-Corporation is a limited Company registered under the Companies Act 1956 It is established for the purposes of prospecting and exploiting minerals within the territory of the State of Gujarat. The Government of Gujarat holds all the 100% of its shares. The Corporation has seven projects in Gujarat. One of the projects is situated at village Kadipani Taluka Chhotaudepur District Baroda known as Flourspar Project. It is for the purpose of excavation and benefication of Flourspar Another of the projects of the Corporation is situated at village Ambaji in Banaskantha district. It is for the purposes of mining different metals.

( 2 ) VARIOUS employees have been engaged





























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top