SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Guj) 162

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :A.M.AHMADI
BHALOD GRAM PANCHAYAT - Appellant
Versus
STATE - Respondent
S.C.A. 1756 of 1978
Decided On : 09/17/1985

Advocates Appeared: B.D.PATEL, N.J.MEHTA, R.M.VIN

Headnote:

Gujarat Panchayat Act ,1961 – Section 9 (1) and (2) - Busboy Land Revenue Code – Section 7a - Petition is whether State Government can exercise Power conferred upon by sec. 7a of the Busboy Land Revenue Code to alter or to add to the limits of a village which has the effect of altering the geographical limits of a gram Panchayat - Government to enable its merger in the village site – Subsequently in February 197g the Collector of Broach allotted plots admeasuring 183 square yards to 101 affected families on their surrendering their right title and interest in their previous holdings - On the trifurcation of the group gram panchayat in 1970 - Here separate gram Panchayat for villages and Pranked came into existence - Once again in faced floods rendering several families homeless - Under the rehabilitation programme under taken by the authorities on this occasion the flood affected families were settled on Survey Nos. of village which were acquired by the Government for rehabilitating these families - Accordingly the members of these flood affected families rehabilitated in the local area of Rundh village voted in the Panchayat elections - Legislative Assembly elections and Parliament elections as belonging to Rundh village. It will be seen from the above facts that for all practical propose rehabilitated families formed part of the village populace – Held , Government to alter or add to the limits of any village but if that village happens to comprise the local area of any Gram Panchayat there can be no doubt that the alteration or addition to the limits of the village will directly affect the limits of the local areas of the concerned panchayats - After enactment of the Act. inclusion within or exclusion from any gram any local area or alteration of its limits must be made after proper consultation as provided by sec. 9 (2) of the Act - To hold otherwise would be to render salutary provision of consultation nugatory - When the Government desires to exercise power under sec. 7a of the Code if the exercise of power affects the local limits of any panchayat or panchayats it must simultaneously resort to sec. 9 (2) of the Act also - If it fails to do so its action would have to be struck down as in this case - petition on the aforesaid limited ground it is not necessary for me to examine other contentions raised in the petition For the above reasons the impugned order issued under sec. 7a of Code is quashed and set aside – Order accordingly.

A. M. AHMADI, J.

( 1 ) THE short question whicharises for consideration this petition is whether the State Government can exercise Power conferred upon ii by sec. 7a of the Busboy Land Revenue Code (hereinafter referred to as the Code) to alter or to add to the limits of a village which has the effect of altering the geographical limits of a gram Panchayat without following the procedure: outlined in sec. 9 (1) of the Gujarat Panchayat Act 1961 (hereinafter the procedure the Act ). The short facts leading to this Irritation are as under.

( 2 ) UNTIL 1970 Bhalod Rule and Pranked villages formed part of on. group gram panchayat. On 5th/ 6/08/1968 river Narbada was in spate and certain low lying areas of Bhalod and Tothidra villages were submerged necessitating the rehabilitation of 207 affected families on Survey Nos. 533. 534 and 535 of village Rundh. As Survey No. 535 was Gauchar land it was surrendared to Government to enable its merger in the village site of Rundh. Subse quently in February 197g the Collector of Broach allotted plots admeasuring 183 square yards to 101 affected families on their surrendering their right title and interest in their previous holdings. On the trifurcation of the group gram panchayat in 1970 Here separate gram Panchayat for villages Bhalod Rundh and Pranked came into existence. Once again in 1970 Bhalod faced floods rendering several families homeless. Under the rehabilitation programme under taken by the authorities on this occasion the flood affected families were settled on Survey Nos. 539 540 546 to 551 and 316 of Rundh village which were acquired by the Government for rehabilitating these families. The petitioners aver that the names of these rehabilitated purpose were included in the voters list prepared for village Rundh under the Representation of the people Act and they voted as such at the election I of Rundh Gram Panchayat and one of them Shri Ratnabhai came to be elected as a member of the Rudh Gram Panchayat. Thus. according to the petitioners the poisons rehabilitated. in Rundh village became yes dents are voters of the village and exercised their franchise accordingly. The Rundh Gram Panchayat also passed a Resolution at its special meeting held on 16/05/1971 that these rehabilitated persons should be sub ject to the judicial of the Rundh Gram Panchayat. However by a subquent resolution passed by the Rundh Gram Panchayat. on 4/10/1975 it expressed the view that the flood affected people of Bhalod village rehabilitate ed on Rundh village Elite should be included in the Rundh Gram Panchayat on condition treat a proportionate revenue grant in respect of the rehabilitated people is allocated to it. Thereupon the Bhalod Gram Panchayat passed a resolution by majority dated 3/10/1975 that the flood affected persons resolution by majority Rundh village in 1970 should be included within the Bhalod Gram Panchayat. Four member of the panchayat were however of the view that a back reference ought to be made to the Taluka-Panchayat for seeking explanation of certain matters before taking a final decision. However the Executive Committee of the Broach District Panchayat at its meeting held on 27/10/1975 resolved that the families rehabilitated in Rundh village in 1968 and 1970 should the treated as earth of Rundh. Gram Panchayat and a recommendation to that effect be made to the Government Pursuant to the said resolution the Mamlatdar Jhagadia passed-an order dated 14/06/1976 including the rehabilitated persons in the porter list of Rundh village for all proposes including hat of election. Accordingly the members of these flood affected families rehabilitated in the local area of Rundh village voted in the Taluka Panchayat elections. Legislative Assembly elections and Parliament elections as belonging to Rundh village. It will be seen from the above facts that for all practical propose the rehabilitated families formed part of the Rundh village populace

( 3 ) IN connection with the Resolution pas













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top