SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Guj) 160

A.M.AHMADI, R.J.SHAH
J. S. SOLANKI – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL CHIEF CONSERVATOR OF FORESTS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.J.JADEJA, R.M.VIN, YATIN OZA

A. M. AHMADI, J.

( 1 ) IS it open to the State Government Competent Authority to both transfer and suspend the Government servant against whom an enquiry touching his integrity is under contemplation or actually pending or whether only one of the two alternatives is available? Is the principal question which arises for determination in these two writ petitions?

( 2 ) THE facts leading to the present two petitions briefly stated are as under: facts of Spl. Civil No. 86 of 1985 the petitioner J. S. Solanki a Range Forest officer stationed at Dharampur Dist. Bulsar came to be suspended by an order dated 7/07/1984 annexure-A to the petition on the allegation of having prepared false vouchers made for payment of wages to labourers and for encashing a cheque of Rs. 20 0 after having left the charge of his post. During the suspension period his Headquarters came to he changed to Rajkot. The petitioner contends that the order of his transfer-cum-suspension is malafide and contrary to the guidelines laid down by the Government. Facts of Spl. Civil Appln. No. 3660 of 1985 the petitioner A. D. Chaudhari Sub-Inspector of police Ahmedabad City came to be suspended by an order dated 3-5-1984 as pr






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top