Gujarat High Court
Judgename :B.K.MEHTA, R.J.SHAH
P.P.F.and S.B.K.S.Mandli Ltd - Appellant
Versus
P.S.B.and F.F.etc.Mandli Ltd. - Respondent
L.P.A. 382 of 1985
Decided On : 11/27/1985
Constitution of India , 1950 – Article 226 - Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963 - 11 (i) (iii) - Petitioner Society was constituted on 31st August, 1985 and applied for inclusion of the members of its Managing Committee to the Authorised Officer-respondent No. 2 herein vide its application and furnished the particulars in pro forma prescribed in that behalf - It is also common ground that the Petitioner Society was issued licence for the years and by the Market Committee-respondent No. 3 herein - Petitioner Society having obtained the licence for have not been shown in relevant column 7 thereof the names of members of the Managing Committee of Petitioner Society were not included in the voters list - Petitioner Society moved this Court for appropriate writs, orders and directions for enjoining the Authorised Officer to include the names of the members of the Managing Committee in the voters list as required - Society was not added in the cause title in the original memo of the main petition - Court have, therefore directed the learned Advocate for the appellant-Society to make proper addition in the cause title of the memo of the petition by showing the appellant-Society as respondent No. 3 in the main petition –Held, Jurisdiction in the matter since there is a provisional finality in the matters pertaining to various stages of election and therefore, having regard to recognised principle in the matter of public importance that election should be concluded as early as possible according to time schedule and all controversial matters as well as disputes arising out of the election including right to vote or stand as a candidate should be postponed till after the elections are over so as to avoid impediment or hindrance to the election process, does not arise - In that view of the matter therefore we are of the opinion that this Court should not exercise the jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution by interfering at this stage with the election process - Pertaining to elections it is proper not to express and opinion on the construction of a rule since the question as to whether a particular person is a voter or not or continues to be a voter, or is entitled to be included in the voters list, or entitle to object to inclusion of the names of some persons who, according to the objector are ineligible for being included, are questions which are pre-eminently fit to be decided by the competent election, authorities - Petition being Special Civil Application No. 5620/85 is dismissed - There should be no order as to costs in this appeal. Interim relief granted by this Court is also vacated and the authorities shall take appropriate action in the matter in the light of this decision. In view of the above no order on Civil Application No filed in this appeal for the reasons aforesaid, the appeals are dismissed and the orders of the learned Single Judge are confirmed - Order accordingly.
( 1 ) SINCE this group of seven Letters Patent Appeals relates to the elections of Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Patan, and a common question of law going to the root of the matter arises in these Letters Patent Appeals, we intend to dispose them of by this common judgement.
( 2 ) IN order to appreciate the two broad contentions, which have been raised in each of the we appeals, we may set out shortly a few facts relevant and material for our purposes so as to enable us to appreciate these contentions in proper perspective. L. P. A. No. 382/85
( 3 ) RESPONDENT No. 1, which is a Cooperative Marketing Society. moved this Court by Special Civil Application No. 5620/85 for appropriate writs. orders and directions enjoining the Authorised Officer respondent No. 2 herein appointed for the purposes of elections of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Patan respondent No. 3 herein, to include the names of the members of the Managing Committee of the Petitioner-Society in the voters list prepared for purposes of the said elections. It is common ground that the Petitioner Society was constituted on 31st August, 1985 and applied for inclusion of the members of its Managing Committee to the Authorised Officer-respondent No. 2 herein vide its application of September 24 1985 and furnished the particulars in the pro forma prescribed in that behalf. It is also common ground that the Petitioner Society was issued licence for the years 1984-85 and 1985-86 by the Market Committee-respondent No. 3 herein on September 27, 1985. There is some dispute as to precisely on what date the application was made for obtaining the licence by the Petitioner Society. It is also admitted on behalf of the Petitioner Society that the Managing Committee was constituted on September 15, 1985. Since the Petitioner Society was intimated by the Authorised Officer vide his letter of September 27, 1985. that in the pro forma application the particulars about the Petitioner Society having obtained the licence for 1984-85 have not been shown in the relevant column 7 thereof the names of the members of the Managing Committee of the Petitioner Society were not included in the voters list, the Petitioner Society moved this Court for appropriate writs, orders and directions for enjoining the Authorised Officer to include the names of the members of the Managing Committee in the voters list as required under S. 11 (i) (iii) of the Gujarat Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act" ).
( 4 ) PURSUANT to the notice issued by this Court, another Co-operative Marketing Society. namely. Patan Proper Fal and Shak Bhaji Kharid Vechan Sahakari Mandli Limited - the appellant herein prayed vide its Civil Application No. 3966/85 to be joined as a party. which application was granted by the learned single Judge (Coram : N. H. Bhatt. J.) by his order of October 21, 1985, and directed that the said Society be joined as a party-respondent at its own costs and consequences. Unfortunately however, by inadvertence, the name of the said Society was not added in the cause title in the original memo of the main petition. We have, therefore directed the learned Advocate for the appellant-Society to make proper addition in the cause title of the memo of the petition by showing the appellant-Society as respondent No. 3 in the main petition.
( 5 ) THE appellant-Society therefore resisted the petition by filing reply affidavit of the Chairman one Shri Bhudarbhai Chhaganbhai Patel to which an affidavit in rejoinder of Shri Dahyabhai P. Patel has been filed on behalf of the original petitioner respondent No. 1 herein. It should be noted that no reply affidavit has been filed on behalf of the Authorised Officer or the Agricultural Produce Market Committee who were original respondents Nos. 1 and 2 in the main petition. The petition has been resisted on behalf of the appellant-Society, inter alia, on two grounds : Firstly it was contended that
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.