SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1985 Supreme(Guj) 225

A.P.RAVANI
KANTILAL DHARAMDAS KACHORIYA – Appellant
Versus
CHIEF OFFICER,palanpur NAGAR PALIKA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.T.BUCH, KUSUM M.SHAH, M.C.SHAH

A. P. RAVANI, J.

( 1 ) IN Special Civil Application No. 2787 of 1984 leave to add party is granted. Mr. D. K. Trivedi Asst. Government Pleader appears on behalf of the newly added party.

( 2 ) THESE two petitions are directed against the respondent-Palanpur Municipality. By a Resolution dated 28/02/1984 by which the Municipality decided to construct shopping center near Power House compound and construct about 300 shops. The Municipality by the impugned Resolution further decided that initially all the 300 shops may not be constructed and disposed of and 159 shops be constructed and be sold. It was further decided by the Municipality that for the shops which would be in the front line premium of Rs. 45 0 should be taken and for the rest of the shops which would be in the rear part of the shopping center premium of Rs. 3 0 should be taken. The amount of premium was required to be paid by the person concerned in three installments. It was also resolved that one who-so-ever gets the shop would have to pay rent at the rate of Rs. 100. 00 per month. From the Resolution it appears that the municipality was desirous to accommodate mostly poor and middle-class business people. Therefore the










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top