Gujarat High Court
Judgename :P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN, S.B.MAJMUDAR
VIJAYBIR ALIAS ABBAL DADA DEVISINH RAJPUT - Appellant
Versus
I.S.SHETHI,police SUPERINTENDENT,c-DIVISION,ahmedabad - Respondent
S.CRI.A. 1143 of 1985
Decided On : 01/17/1986
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 134 - Criminal Procedure Code , 1908 – Section 360 and 361 - Bombay Police Act - 56 (b) , 60 , 10 (2) and 59 - Petitioner has come forward the the present Special Criminal Application to quash the notice issued for externment which is Annexure A to the petition order passed by the externing authority externing the petitioner which is Annexure `b to the petition and order passed in appeal confirming the externment order which is Annexure C to the petition - Petitioner has been externed from the area under jurisdiction of Police Commissioner and its contiguous Rural and Districts for a period of two years - Superintendent of Police `c Division Ahmedabad City issued notice under sec. 59 of the Bombay Police Act regarding externment of the petitioner - Notice further states that petitioner is robbing money frompeople residing in the aforesaid areas and from the innocent people passing through the said areas by showing Knife or Razor or by beating them by giving fist or kick blows or giving them threat of violence - It is further stated that he used to beat innocent people passing through that area on the suspicion that either they are giving information to Police about petitioners illegal business of liquor or they are informant of Police Alleging above said acts of petitioner notice further states that witnesses to aforesaid acts are not willing to come forward to give evidence openly as they apprehend threat to their life and property - With above said allegations notice mentions that the authorities are intending to extern the petitioner - Learned counsel filed a draft amendment questioning the vires of secs. 56 and 59 of the Bombay Police Act – Court have today allowed said amendment and thought it fit that no notice is necessary to be issued to the Advocate General in this matter in as much as this question has been fully discussed and decided by our Full Bench in the case of v. Dy. Commissioner of Police reported- Full Bench in that case following a series of decisions of Supreme Court held that challenge to vires of the Bombay Police Act would not be permissible in High Court in view of matter having been considered by Supreme Court on earlier occasion as a result of which consideration the sections have been held to be valid –Held, Petitioner has examined as many as 24 witnesses and argued the matter through a counsel - It is not easy to sum up the evidence of all these witnesses adverting to arguments of petitioners counsel within a short space of time - Explanation offered by respondents to the effect that there were riots and agitation in the City which took the time of Police Officials who have to pass the externment order cannot be ignored also - Thus the respondents have given sufficient reason for delay and we are of the view that such an explanation can be safely accepted on facts and circumstances of present case - Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner makes an oral application under Article 134 (1) (c) read with Article 134 of the Constitution for leave to appeal to Supreme Court of India - Full Bench of our High Court in the decision in v. Dy. Commi. of Police reported in granted certificate since it felt that argument advanced in respect of secs. 56 and 59 of the Bombay Police Act regarding the Constitutional validity is a matter to be decided by Supreme Court - Following very same reasoning the leave asked for is granted - Learned counsel appealing for petitioner strenuously contended that the order of externment may be stayed until the Supreme Court is moved in this matter or at least for a period during which the Court furnishes the certified copy of this judgment - Court are afraid we cannot accede to this request as both the authorities have held on facts that the petitioner is a dangerous and desperate person and is a menace to the society - Petition dismissed.
( 1 ) THE petitioner has come forward the the present Special Criminal Application to quash the notice issued for externment which is Annexure A to the petition the order passed by the externing authority externing the petitioner which is Annexure `b to the petition and the order passed in appeal confirming the externment order which is Annexure C to the petition. The petitioner has been externed from the area under the jurisdiction of Ahmedabad Police Commissioner and its contiguous Ahmedabad Rural Gandhinagar Kheda and Mehsana Districts for a period of two years. The Superintendent of Police `c Division Ahmedabad City issued notice under sec. 59 of the Bombay Police Act regarding externment of the petitioner under sec. 56 (b) of the said Act stating that the petitioner is a dangerous and a fierce person and commits acts of force at Saraspur Potalia Talav Dhabavali Chawls corner near Anil Starch Mill Corner of Vire Bhagats Chawl Corner of Manilal Kadias Chawl near Manchas Masjid near Urinal near the Gate of Saraspur `e Colony Garden Opposite Manchas Masjid near No. D 17 of the Insurance Corporation Dispensary Corner of Saraspur Rang-Shala Compound Corner of Annapurna Society backside of Nutan Mill Bombay Housing and near Swimming Pool Saraspur Potalia Talav which are all under the limit of Shaher Kotada Police Station. It is further stated in the notice that such type of fierce activities are being perpetrated by the petitioner from June 1983 in the above said areas. The notice further states that the petitioner is robbing money from the people residing in the aforesaid areas and from the innocent people passing through the said areas by showing Rampuri Knife or Razor or by beating them by giving fist or kick blows or giving them threat of violence. It is further stated that he used to beat the innocent people passing through that area on the suspicion that either they are giving information to the Police about the petitioners illegal business of liquor or they are informant of the Police Alleging the above said acts of the petitioner the notice further states that the witnesses to the aforesaid acts are not willing to come forward to give evidence openly as they apprehend threat to their life and property. With the above said allegations the notice mentions that the authorities are intending to extern the petitioner for a period of two years from the area which is under the jurisdiction of the Ahmedabad City Police Commissioner and its adjoining areas of Ahmedabad Rural Gandhinagar Kheda and Mehsana Districts further stating that if the petitioner is not externed from these areas it is possible that the petitioner is likely to continue his violent activities through his associates and agents. The notice directed the petitioner to be present before the authority concerned at 4-00 P. M. on 13-8-1984 for explaining the allegations levelled against him. The petitioner examined as many as 24 witnesses before the Police Superintendent C Division Ahmedabad City and the Deputy Commissioner Traffic Branch Ahmedabad City after hearing the advocate for the Petitioner passed the externment order under sec. 565 (b) of the Bombay Police Act 1951 externing the petitioner from the areas mentioned in the notice for a period of two years from the date of order i. e. 8/05/1985 As against this order of externment the petitioner preferred an appeal to the Government under sec. 60 of the Bombay Police Act and the Deputy Secretary Home Department Gujarat Government confirmed the order of externment passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police under sec. 60 (3) of the Act. It is to quash the notice the externment order and the appellate order referred above that the present Special Criminal Application is filed.
( 2 ) MR. Shethna the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner took as many as 13 points in order to quash the order of externment. Finally the learned counsel filed a draft amendment questioning the vires of secs
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.