Gujarat High Court
Judgename :P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN
BABU KISHAN KAHAR - Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,vadodara - Respondent
S.CRI.A. 1210 of 1985
Decided On : 01/09/1986
Bombay Police Act ,1951 – Section 56 (b) and 60 - Special Criminal Application for issue of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ to declare that the orders of externment Annexure B and C are illegal null and void and to set aside the same - Superintendent of Police Baroda Division Baroda who is the externing authority issued show cause notice under sec. 56 of the Bombay Police Act to the petitioner herein stating that he has committed the following offences - Head strong man and are threatening the persons passing through Pain Gate and Haran-Khana Road and taking money from them. You are also threatening them to kill them - Money from the Shop holders and Galawala at the point of knife -You give them threats to kill in case they file the complaint in the police - People residing in the surrounding area of Haran-Khana Road to put your illicit liquor in their houses - Against this order the petitioner preferred an appeal under sec. 60 of the Bombay Police Act 1951 and appellate authority modified order of the externing authority by confirming the externment order to the area of Baroda City and Baroda Rural District and that too for a period of one year only - It is as against this order the present Special Criminal Application has been filed learned counsel appearing for petitioner submitted that the externment order has been passed mechanically without any application of mind that period of offence has not been given in show cause notice and that area of offence contradicts between the show cause notice and externment order – Held, Petitioner is using force and violence since March 1984 - Thus it is clear that the externing authority without giving show cause notice as regards the places mentioned in externment order and also the period of offence committed by the petitioner has come to the conclusion that the petitioner has carried on the illegal activities in the places mentioned in the externment order referred above and that too from March 1984 - Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that even though petitioner appeared before the externing authority at 12-00 noon on 22 he neither submitted any explanation nor examined any witnesses - Even the record shows that no witnesses have been examined in this case - Nevertheless in the externment order it is stated that the externing authority considered the explanation submitted by the petitioner and evidence produced on his behalf. This is patently a mistake - This shows how externing authority mechanically passed present externment order without any application of his mind to the facts of the case - Externment order bristles with various irregularities and exposes callous attitude of the externing authority in passing such an order mechanically without any application of the mind - When especially liberty of a person is involved it is the duty of externing authority to be careful and accurate before passing any such order - This is a typical case where authorities concerned have mechanically passed such an arbitrary order which cannot be upheld by any court of law - Petition allowed.
( 1 ) THE petitioner has come forward with this Special Criminal Application for issue of a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ to declare that the orders of externment Annexure B and C are illegal null and void and to set aside the same. Superintendent of Police Baroda Division Baroda who is the externing authority issued show cause notice under sec. 56 of the Bombay Police Act to the petitioner herein stating that he has committed the following offences:" (1) You are head strong man and are threatening the persons passing through Pain Gate and Haran-Khana Road and taking money from them. You are also threatening them to kill them. (2) You are looting the money from the Shop holders and Galawala at the point of knife. You give them threats to kill in case they file the complaint in the police. (3) You tell the people residing in the surrounding area of Haran-Khana Road to put your illicit liquor in their houses and all their refusing to do so you give threats to kill them at the point of knife". After stating so the show cause notice mentions that the externing authority proposes to remove the petitioner from the area of Baroda City and District and contiguous Baroda Rural area Kheda Broach and Panchayat Districts for a period of two years from the date of the intended order. It is further stated in the show cause notice that the petitioner commits offences punishable under Chapter XVI and XVII of the Indian Penal Code and his victims do not come forward to give evidence in public by reason of apprehension on their part as regards the safety of their person and property. In this notice it is directed that the petitioner should present himself before the externing authority at 12-00 noon on 28-2-1984 for giving his explanation. According to Mr. Patel the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in spite of the fact that the petitioner was present before the externing authority at 12-00 noon on 28-2-1984 he was not heard and on the other hand the externment order was passed only on 23 On 23-4-1985 the Deputy Commissioner of Police Vadodara City has passed the externment order under sec. 56 (b) of the Bombay Police Act 1951 stating that the petitioner is a head-strong ferocious and dangerous person and commits offences in the area of Pani Gate Kabar Maholla Haran-Khana Road Ranavas outside Pani Gate Mojulvada Khatki Vada and near Pani-darvaja. The externment order further states that the petitioner used fore and violence Since 1984 March and that he is committing the offences listed in the show cause notice which has been extracted in paragraph supra. The externment order further states that the externing authority has considered the explanation submitted by the petitioner and the evidence produced on his behalf. Finally the order states that the externing authority is satisfied that the petitioner Babu Kishan Kahar is a dangerous and desperate person and he is involved in the commission of acts of force and violence punishable under Chapters XVI and XVII of the Indian Penal Code. With these observations the externing authority externed the petitioner from the area of Vadodara City under the Commissioner of Police and from the contiguous Districts of Vadodara Rural Kheda Panchayat and Bharuch for a period of two years. Against this order the petitioner preferred an appeal under sec. 60 of the Bombay Police Act 1951 and the appellate authority modified the order of the externing authority by confirming the externment order to the area of Baroda City and Baroda Rural District and that too for a period of one year only. It is as against this order the present Special Criminal Application has been filed. Mr. Satish R. Patel the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the externment order has been passed mechanically without any application of the mind that the period of offence has not been given in the show cause notice and that the area of the offence contradicts between t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.