SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Guj) 1

D.H.SHUKLA, J.P.DESAI
NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
GORDHANBHAI AMBALAL BAROT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: G.M.AMIN, RAJNI H.MEHTA, T.R.MISHRA

D. H. SHUKLA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. has challenged by this appeal the judgment and final order of the M. A. C. Tribunal No. 1 Ahmedabad (Rural) Narol dated 26-3-1979 whereby the learned Tribunal has directed the opponents to pay to the respondent No. 1 original applicant Gordhanbhai Ambalal Barot a sum of Rs. 78 600 together with running interest thereon at 6 per cent per annum from the date of the filing of the application till payment or realisation.

( 2 ) MR. R. H. Mehta the learned Advocate for the Appellant raised before us a sole issue as to whether the liability of the appellant was not limited only to the extent of Rs. 50 0 and that if it was so the Tribunal has erred in making it liable along with other respondents to the total extent of Rs. 78 600 with interest etc. The submission of Mr. Mehta is that the Tribunal has erred in not recognising the concerned vehicle bearing Registration No. 2472 as a goods vehicle as defined in sec. 2 (8) of the Motor Vehicles Act 1939 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and in treating the same vehicle as covered under clause (c) of sub-sec. (2) of sec. 95 of the Act. Mr. Mehta cited before us the relevant







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top