SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Guj) 54

P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN, S.B.MAJMUDAR
NARAYANLAL HIMATLAL BHATT – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ANIL S.KOTHARI, J.M.THAKAR, N.H.BHATT

P. R. GOKULAKRISHNAN, S. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) A retired High Court Judge and three others have filed this public interest litigation questioning the constitutional validity of the Gujarat Legislative Assembly Members Pension Act 1984 with a further prayer to issue a writ of mandamus against the State of Gujarat restraining it from issuing any notification in the Official Gazette for appointing the date for coming into force of the impugned Act. i. e. the Gujarat Legislative Assembly Members Pension Act 1984 In and by the said Act the members of the Legislative Assembly are given the opportunity of receiving pension of Rs. 300. 00 who have served as members for a term of office of five years whether before or after such commencement and whether continuously or not. The Act further provides that where any person has served as aforesaid for a period exceeding five years he will be paid an additional pension of Rs. 60. 00 per month for every year of such service in excess of five years and that however the pension payable shall not exceed Rs. 600. 00 per month. There is a further provision in the Act that in case the Assembly is dissolved before the expire of its duration of five years











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top