SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Guj) 95

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :A.M.AHMADI
RANCHHODBHAI S.DALWADI - Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT AGRICULTURE UNIVERSITY - Respondent
S.C.A. 2418 of 1979
Decided On : 07/17/1986

Advocates Appeared: GIRISH PATEL, J.R.NANAVATI

Headnote:

Gujarat Agricultural University Act 1969 - Section 41 - Petitioner joined Government service as a Clerk - Subsequently promoted on post of Superintendent Department of Agriculture - While he was serving on deputation Agricultural University a vacancy arose cadre of Legal Assistant petitioner being a Law Graduate and fully acquainted with departmental activities was considered for appointment said post and was temporarily promoted as Legal Assistant scale - Order temporarily promoting petitioner to post of Legal Assistant as a stop-gap arrangement - By pay petitioner was fixed at pay scale of - Subsequently University issued an filling post of Legal Assistant on a long term basis - Petitioner applied for appointment said post by his application - He was interviewed Selection Committee and on being found fit a letter of appointment came to be issued - Held, After his retrenchment management filled in three posts belonging clerical cadre without inviting for re-employment to anyone said three posts - Complained that he had been wrongly and unjustifiably kept out of re-employment even though vacancies had arisen clerical cadre to which be originally belonged - Management contended that held Assistant Store Keeper his retrenchment and since vacancies were cadre of Clerks management was not bound to offer him re-employment - This submission was dealt with t is then urged principle of industrial adjudication on which the respondents rely cannot require appellant to offer to unless said job same category to which belonged - On principle right in offer would be conditioned consideration category to which retrenched employee belonged - Supreme Court however reached conclusion belonged category and upheld Tribunals order - Above observations clearly lend support contention that in order that appointment can be termed are employment it must be shown that it belongs same category of which the incumbent held time of retirement Patna High Court Sugar Works also held that re-employment within meaning of Industrial Disputes A ct imports significance of taking back a retrenched workman same category to which he belonged - Order accordingly

A. M. AHMADI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner joined Government service as a Clerk with effect from 1/11/1943 In due course he was promoted to the post of Superintendent in the Department of Agriculture when his services came to be loaned to the Gujarat Agricultural University which started functioning with effect from 1/06/1972 While he was serving on deputation in the Agricultural University a vacancy arose in the cadre of Legal Assistant and the petitioner being a Law Graduate and fully acquainted with departmental activities was considered for appointment to the said post and was temporarily promoted as Legal Assistant in the scale of Rs. 350-850 (revised to Rs. 650-1200 with effect from 1/01/1973 ). Annexure A to the petition is a copy of the order temporarily promoting the petitioner to the post of Legal Assistant as a stop-gap arrangement. By Annexure B the pay of the petitioner was fixed at Rs. 525. 00 in the pay scale of Rs 350-850 with effect from 7/02/1973. Subsequently the University issued an advertisement No. 19 of 1975 dated 22/11/1975 for filling in the post of Legal Assistant on a long term basis. The petitioner applied for appointment to the said post by his application Annexure C dated 26/12/1975. He was interviewed by the Selection Committee and on being found fit a letter of appointment Annexure D came to be issued. It may be mentioned that while applying for the post of Legal Assistant the petitioner had in paragraph 6 of his application Annexure C stated as under:if selected I would accept the post of Legal Assistant in the University at pay of Rs. 920. 00 in the revised pay scale of Rs. 650-30-740-35-810-EB-880-40-1000- EB-40-1200 (exclusive of pension that may be admissible to me on retirement) in view of my above long standing experience and in view of the fact that I will have to let go any further liberalisation of pension rules which the Government may make in future after I retire from Government service. In the letter of appointment Annexure D no specific mention was made to this condition set out in paragraph 6 of the application. The letter of appointment Annexure D however was to the following effect :in continuation of your interview taken on 3/03/1976 for the post of Legal Assistant. in this University. I am directed to inform you that this University has decided to appoint you as Legal Assistant. in this University as fresh/ direct appointment. If you are willing this University may be intimated accordingly and please take necessary steps to get yourself relieved from Government and also to take up your appointment within three months. The petitioner conveyed his willingness to accept the appointment by his letter Annexure E dated 5/05/1976 but reiterated that his pay would have to be filed as stated in his application. After conveying his willingness to accept the appointment to the post of Legal Assistant in the Agricultural University the petitioner served notice of retirement Annexure F dated 24/06/1976. On expiry of the notice period the Government was pleased to allow the petitioner to retire voluntarily from Government service with effect from 23/09/1976 as per Rule 8 of the Revised Pension Rules 1950 read with Government Resolution of 1/06/1976. Annexure G to the petition is a copy of the Office Order issued under the signature of Director of Agriculture dated 21/09/1976 After the petitioner thus voluntarily retired from Government service a regular appointment order was issued by Registrar of the University Annexure B appointing the petitioner as Legal Assistant in the pay scale of Rs. 350-850 plus usual allowance as per University Rules. It was specifically mentioned in the said letter of appointment that the pay of the petitioner shall be fixed subject to approval by the concerned authority at Rs. 920. 00 per mouth from the date of his joining as Legal Assistant in the revised pay scale (proposed) of Rs. 650-1200. In the meantime he was permitted to draw his salary in the scale of Rs. 350











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top