SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Guj) 131

R.C.MANKAD, S.A.SHAH
BHUTABHAI ANGADBHAI – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: N.R.THAKKAR, TARUN V.SHAH

S. A. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal arises out of the judgment and award dated 18 passed by the learned Commissioner of Workmen Compensation Junagadh in Workmen Compensation Case No. 31 of 1984 filed by the parents (appellants herein) of deceased Anilkumar who died on 1 due to the injuries sustained by him on account of electric shock which he received while he was doing the work of painting the electric pole on 30-5-1982 near Dolatpura Sub-Station belonging to the Gujarat Electricity Board (Respondent No. 1) (hereinafter referred to as the Board ).

( 2 ) THE appellants claimed Rs. 90 0 as compensation against the Board who is the owner of the said sub-station and electric pole as also against its Executive Engineer (Transmission) at Dhoraji (Respondent No. 2) and one Khakha Hamir Labour Contractor of the Board (Respondent No. 3 ). The Commissioner of Workmen Compensation Junagadh (hereinafter referred to as the Commissioner) by his aforesaid judgment and order awarded an amount of Rs. 24 0 as compensation and Rs. 12 0 as penalty totalling to Rs. 36 0 with interest and costs only from Respondent No. 3-Contractor and rejected the claim of the appellants-claimants against the Board and i













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top