SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Guj) 124

B.S.KAPADIA
JAGDISHCHANDRA CHANDULAL SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.SHAH, K.T.DAVE

B. S. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THE present petition is directed against the order passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate Court No. 5 sit Ahmedabad on 4-9-86 on application filed in Criminal Case No. 1793183.

( 2 ) IN nutshell it may be stated that the petitioner who is the original complainant has filed the complaint in the court of learned Metropolitan Magistrate Court No. 5 Ahmedabad against the opponents No. 2 and 3 (original accused) for the offences under Section 420 read with Section 34 and/or Section 109 of the I. P. C. and the said complaint was registered as Criminal Case No. 1793/83. It is alleged that the is accused Nos. 1 and 2 who are present opponents Nos. 2 and 3 had previously sold land to one Mahobatsing Mansing Jadeja by a registered sale-deed and they suppressed this material fact from the present petitioner (original complainant induced the complainant to part with the amount of Rs. 72 500

( 3 ) DURING the course of the proceedings an application 5 as preferred for producing certain documents and for exhibiting the same if the other side i. e. the accused have no objection. The said application was filed by the original complainant. Along with the said applicatio













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top