SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Guj) 2

G.T.NANAVATI, P.R.GOKULAKRISHNAN
MANHARLAL I. SHAH – Appellant
Versus
YOGESHKUMAR KANAIYALAL SARAIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.C.PATEL, VIVEK BAROT

G. T. NANAVATI, J.

( 1 ) THIS petition is filed by the original informant whose sister Anita died in suspicions circumstances on 14-9-1985. She was married to Yogeshkumar respondent No. 1 about four months before the date of her death. She died at her husbands place and the information which was conveyed to the relatives of Anita and others was that she had committed suicide lay hanging. No post mortem examination was allowed to be performed. The petitioners case is that no proper action was taken by the local police; and therefore he moved the higher police authorities; and thereafter an offence came to be registered at Nadiad Town Police Station against respondents No. 1 to 5 for the offences punishable under secs. 306 498 201 176 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. Respondent No. 2 is the brother of respondent No. 1; and respondent No. 3 is his sister. Respondent No 4 is the mother of respondent No. J. Respondent No 5 is his maternal uncle.

( 2 ) AFTER completing the investigation the police charge-sheeted those accused in the Court of the Judicial Magistrate First Class Nadiad. The learned Magistrate committed the case to the Court of Sessions. Shri Jhala the learned Public Prosec
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top