SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Guj) 20

A.M.AHMADI
GOVINDBHAI SOMABHAI NAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: M.A.BUKHARI, S.B.VAKIL

A. M. AHMADI, J.

( 1 ) THE Petitioners challenge the order of Secretary (Appeals) Government of Gujarat dated 29/08/1983 whereby he cancelled the order of the Taluka Development Officer dated 19/ 20/04/1982 granting permission to the owners/occupants of certain lands situate in Kalol Taluka of Mehsana District for making non-agricultural use of the said lands. The facts leading to this group of petitions briefly stated are as under.

( 2 ) THE lands which are the subject matter of these petitions were admittedly agricultural in character. The owners/occupants of the said lands preferred applications dated 13/ 14/04/1982 under sec. 65 of the Bombay Land Revenue Code (the Code for short) for permission to make non-agricultural use of their lands to the Taluka Panchayat. The Taluka Development Officer Kalol granted the permission by his order dated 19/ 20/04/1982. On the Secretary (Appeals) Government of Gujarat coming to know about the same he issued show cause notices dated 31/03/1983 purporting to act under sec. 211 of the Code calling upon the owners/occupants to show cause why the order of the Taluka Development Officer Kalol granting permission to make non-agricultural use of the





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top