SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1987 Supreme(Guj) 65

P.M.CHAUHAN
RAJNIKANT AMBALAL PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: KALPESH ZAVERI, S.R.DIVETIA

P. M. CHAUHAN, J.

( 1 ) IN all the three Miscellaneous Criminal Applications identical questions of law and fact are involved and the parties are same and therefore they are disposed of by common judgment.

( 2 ) MISCELLANEOUS Criminal Application No. 158 of 1985 arises out of the order in Criminal Case No. 1612 of 1984 Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 159 of 1985 arises out of the order in Criminal Case No. 1613 of 1984 and Miscellaneous Criminal Application No. 160 of 1985 arises out of the order in Criminal Case No. 1614 of 1984 by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate 5 Court Ahmedabad issuing process for the offences punishable under secs. 406 and 420 Indian Penal Code against the petitioner on the complaint filed by opponent No. 2 Hitendrabhai Vadibhai Kapasi the Accountant of Parekh Decorators.

( 3 ) OPPONENT No. 2 the Accountant of Parekh Decorators filed the complaint contending that he is serving as Accountant in Parekh Decorators and has no personal knowledge about the allegations in the complaint but has information about the accounts etc. of Parekh Decorators as he is serving there as Accountant and therefore at the instance and under the instructions of the partner















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top