( 1 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 2 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 3 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 4 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 5 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 6 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 7 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 8 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 9 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 10 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 11 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 12 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 13 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 14 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 15 ) X x x x x x x x x. ]

( 16 ) BEFORE parting with this judgment, we are constrained to observe here that the learned Addl. Sessions Judge committed an error in bringing on record in the evidence of P. S. I. Sajjansinh Parmar P. W. 19 Exh. 71 what came to the knowledge of the said officer during the investigation of other Sessions case. In the evidence of said P. S. I. , it is stated at para 3 as follows :-

( 17 ) P. S. I. should not have (been) permitted to state in the evidence recorded in Sessions Case No. 6/86 what came to his knowledge during the course of the investigation of other case. The learned Judge fell in error in allowing this to be brought on record of this case.

( 18 ) IT is also stated by P. S. I. Sajjansinh Parmar at para 4 as follows :-

( 19 ) THIS is also not permissible. Any part o